Biased Judges and Allegedly
Sep 14th, 2006 by Brian A. Thomas
The prosecution in the case against Saddam think the head judge is biased. Gee, you think? While questioning a Kurdish witness he asked why he would want to meet with him if he was a dictator. The judge replied, “You were not a dictator.” Either the judge is biased or the worlds largest idiot.
The story that talks about this, uses the press’ favorite word before/during a trial, “allegedly” when talking about how his regime committed atrocities against the Kurds. There is no question of if he did, so why use allegedly? Is this the Associated Press normal left slant, or just them using their normal trial words? I would normally say that it is just the way the press normally deals with trials, however, the article never once mentions that he did in fact do these crimes. It isn’t like there is a jury here in the United States that they might sway if they show the pictures of tons of people lying dead in a village from his chemical weapon attacks on his own people. Perhaps they are afraid if they remind the American public of how truly evil Saddam is, people might stop protesting the war as much as they do.
Since the Associated Press is afraid, here is a reminder of the many thousands of Saddam’s people who died at his own hands (as the image is so jarring, I’ll move it off the main page and you’ll have to click the more link below to see it and read the rest of the story):
From Kurdistan Regional Government website http://www.krg.org
Just multiply that several thousand times over and you’ll have a nice idea of what Saddam did. Go ahead Associated Press and the rest of the left leaning media, look at the murdered little baby still on it’s dead mother’s back and the little child killed to her side and then call Saddam a nice guy, say he only “allegedly” did it. Go ahead, forget to remind people that, while we now know he was not restarting his weapons of mass destruction program, that the weapons that did this are still missing. (And yes, I know that the reason we know he had more then he used is because we were among the ones who gave them to him to fight his battle against Iran, the bigger enemy at the time.)
Go ahead Associated Press, talk about what we all agree was horrible things done by American soldiers at Abu Ghurayb, but forget to mention that Saddam daily did far worse things in the same prison every day for his entire reign, mostly for political and racial, not security, reasons.
Go ahead Associated Press and the rest of you left leaning and left wing media, make Saddam look like a nice leader that we disposed for little to no reason. The American public is buying it, but some of us know the truth.
